Skip to main content. This browser is no longer supported. Download Microsoft Edge More info. Contents Exit focus mode. Is this page helpful? Please rate your experience Yes No. Any additional feedback? Submit and view feedback for This product This page. The working set; however, is just limited to what can be allocated within the Kernel's 2GB virtual address range. Since most modern systems have more than 1 GB of physical RAM, the System File Cache's working set's size on a bit system typically isn't a problem.
With bit systems, the kernel virtual address space is very large and is typically larger than physical RAM on most systems. On these systems the System File Cache's working set can be very large and is typically about equal to the size of physical RAM. If this happens, then process working sets are paged out and there is contention for physical pages — resulting in performance degradation. The blog post "Too Much Cache" contains sample code and a compiled utility that can be used to manually set the System File Cache's working set size.
Scoping the Issue: Although we normally see this issue on 64 bit file servers and backup servers and Microsoft Data Protection Manager DPM Servers we do at times see this on bit machines as well. What occurs is that the system will, through its use of cache, consume all available memory until the system becomes resource starved and unable to satisfy any new requests for physical memory. Additional data required may include the following:. That brings us back to the only provided solution - use the provided APIs.
While this isn't an ideal solution, it does work, but with the limitations mentioned above. While this service does not completely address the limitations above, it does provide some additional relief. Windows and beyond do not expose all of these "knobs" to the administrator or users. How does a read-ahead work? It uses heuristics to anticipate which segments to put into virtual storage.
If file B is always accessed after file A, then whenever file A is opened, file B will be opened "sequentially accessed". The image shows some performance metrics. Many parts of this article touch on these metrics. What is meant by transparent? When you develop a Windows application, you write it as though it is directly working on files.
You don't invoke the file cache yourself. The term "transparent" means that the file cache is hidden. Windows has a file cache system in many ways similar to UNIX. This is because both operating systems borrowed ideas from VMS.
How much memory does the file cache use? Usually a lot. In Windows and higher, this is determined dynamically. In the performance monitor, the cache performance object will report this value as system cache resident bytes.
Sections are stored in the virtual memory instead of logical files. The size of each section is KB. On file servers and IIS machines, the file cache is the greatest part of the memory size. However: The size is carefully determined by logic, which negates the need to tweak it yourself.
You can disable file caching, but it's hard to do. You would have to provide low-level file IO routines to do this. NET developer, this would be likely impossible in managed code of any language. File servers like IIS will use the file system cache for every file they serve. Client computers will also use file caches for the files they download.
So the same files will be cached in many spots using the same algorithms. Google Chrome. The article I read does not factor in newer programs like Chrome that use aggressive caching in memory. I expect that Google Chrome and Firefox use many custom caches. So: Caching is even more prevalent today. This is evident in Google Chrome, which uses extensive memory caches.
Resource duplication. In a closed system, it would be ideal to eliminate all of the double-caching to save computer resources. Methods of doing this would be interesting to develop and observe.
File cache is global. Windows and newer versions make it hard to see what applications are doing with the cache. As stated in the start, the file cache introduces another level of complexity, and this reflects that. A logical read is when an application specifies to read a file.
However, the file cache "diverts" this and redirects the request to the virtual cache. The stats reflect logical reads. Tip: The file cache works transparently and will "transform" what the application assumes is a disk read into a virtual memory read. And: The cache can do this because it is encapsulated and it overrides the IO interfaces. The cache makes benchmarks harder to perform and repeat. This is because it introduces a level of transparency and complexity. To get around this, testers use measurements of "cold start" and "warm start.
Caveat emptor: The document helpfully provides this warning, which means "buyer beware. Copy Interface explanation. The Copy Interface is how Microsoft implemented the file cache in a backward compatible way. This means that both the OS and the application have file buffers. Two places: Data exists in two places.
0コメント